Accountability and Progress in the Philippines A Call for Openness, Hope, and Systemic Transformation

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this article, titled "Progress and Accountability in the Philippines: An Appeal for Transparency, Optimism, and Systemic Transformation," are solely those of the author and are based on personal interpretation and perspective. This article is not intended to represent a conclusive study or empirical research. Rather, it reflects the author's own observations and insights on the issues discussed. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and consider multiple viewpoints before forming their own conclusions.

I. Introduction:

Accountability and Progress in the Philippines A Call for Openness, Hope, and Systemic Transformation

The path to advancement is never simple, and in the Philippine context, it frequently seems as though we are negotiating a thick fog, where there is a lack of both hope and direction. We cannot afford to remain motionless, though, in spite of the annoyance, the widespread disrespect for accountability, and the widespread lack of accountability among those in positions of authority. Without a clear plan and a sense of purpose, we cannot just go out and weep or take to the streets. Inaction is not an option, but neither is despair. Even though the road ahead appears uncertain, we must resolutely map out a course for the future.

The Philippines' Accountability Situation
Like many developing countries, the Philippines struggles with a pervasive culture of impunity, in which public servants frequently avoid accountability for their deeds. Many citizens are disillusioned and depressed about the future as a result of this lack of accountability. Notwithstanding these obstacles, it is important to keep in mind that advancement is achievable, as long as we are prepared to demand better and put systemic changes into place.

Adopting the Japanese custom of seppuku, an ancient form of ritual suicide as a form of atonement for failure or dishonour, is one radical—though possibly overblown—recommendation for public officials. This drastic measure highlights the seriousness of the situation and the urgent need for an accountability culture in public service, even though it is obviously not a practical or moral solution. For those in positions of authority, shame and dishonour should not be alien ideas; rather, they should be the inevitable results of betraying the public's confidence.

II. Malaysia as a Teaching Tool: The Effectiveness of Automation in Fighting Corruption
Malaysia is a bright example of progress in our Southeast Asian neighbourhood. Malaysia's daring decision to automate customs procedures, cutting clearance times from three days to just one minute, exemplifies how technology can enhance governance. The Philippines can learn a lot from this revolution in efficiency and transparency brought about by the move towards automation.

The following are some ways that Malaysia's automation of customs has reduced corruption:

Decreased Human Interaction: 

Customs officials and traders no longer need to personally interact as much when customs procedures are automated. Bribery and favouritism, which are common in systems with significant human involvement, are reduced as a result.

Transparency: 

The process is made more transparent by automated systems, which provide real-time tracking and updates. This openness guarantees that all parties involved have access to the same information and lowers the possibility of manipulation.

Accountability: 

Automated systems generate digital records that offer a transparent audit trail, which facilitates the identification and resolution of any anomalies or unethical behaviour. Accountability can be enforced and actions can be tracked thanks to this digital footprint.

Efficiency: 

Traders are less motivated to offer "speed money" or bribes in order to speed up clearance when processing times are shortened. Corruption becomes less necessary when the system functions effectively.

Consistency: 

Automated systems reduce subjective decision-making, which frequently results in corruption, by applying rules consistently. Applying the rules consistently guarantees equity and lowers the possibility of misuse.

III. The Philippine Real Landscape: Obstacles and Prospects
Automation is not a panacea, even though it can drastically cut down on corruption opportunities. Deeply ingrained problems cannot be resolved by technology alone, and the Philippines must acknowledge this. To effectively combat corruption, strict regulations, a robust legal framework, and ongoing monitoring are necessary. For automated systems to function as intended and not create new vulnerabilities, proper implementation and supervision are essential.

Furthermore, there must be a culture change, a revitalized dedication to honesty and public service. This starts with leadership that exemplifies the virtues of accountability, responsibility, and transparency. Without this cultural shift, people who are determined to misuse systems can subvert even the most sophisticated ones.

An Appeal for Hope and Clarity 

We cannot give up hope in spite of the difficulties. By adopting technology to improve government operations and lessen corruption, the Philippines could emulate Malaysia. However, this calls for a well-defined plan, capable leadership, and the public's will to demand and maintain change.

As we proceed, let us keep in mind that without a healthy dose of optimism and a realistic understanding of the path ahead, progress is impossible. Even though we might not have all the answers, we must be resolute in our search for them. The Philippines' future rests on our capacity to imagine a better future and to hold ourselves and our leaders responsible for pursuing it..

IV. APPLICATION OF RISK MANAGEMENT 

Here's a structured table addressing the "Risk for Progress and Accountability in the Philippines: An Appeal for Transparency, Optimism, and Systemic Transformation":

Statement of Relevant Issues/Needs & Expectations (Uncertainties)	Specific Issues & Concerns	Interested Parties (IP)	Identify Effect - Immediate	Impact - Long Term Effect	Risk (Negative Effect + Uncertainties = Risk)	Opportunity (Positive Effect + Uncertainties = Opportunity)	RO Owner	Compliance Obligation (Law in the Philippines)	Control Implemented (Measure)	Risk Impact (Rating 1,2,3)	Likelihood (Rating 1,2,3)	Risk Score (Risk Impact x Likelihood)	Risk Level (Low 1-2, Medium 3-5, High 6-9)	Project, Activity, Programs (PAPs to Address Risk/Opportunity)
Lack of transparency in government processes	Corruption, inefficiency	Citizens, Businesses	Reduced trust in government	Long-term economic instability	Corruption in allocations and decision-making	Improved accountability and trust in government	Transparency Officer	RA No. 9485 (Anti-Red Tape Act)	Regular audits, public reporting	3	3	9	High	Transparency and Accountability Program, Anti-Corruption Initiatives
Insufficient public engagement and feedback mechanisms	Low civic participation	Community Groups, NGOs	Low public input in governance	Weak community development	Marginalized voices in policy-making	Enhanced public engagement and inclusive decision-making	Public Relations Manager	EO No. 2 (Freedom of Information Act)	Feedback systems, community forums	2	3	6	Medium	Public Engagement and Feedback Systems, Civic Participation Programs
Inefficient use of resources and budget allocations	Mismanagement, waste	Government Agencies, Taxpayers	Budget overruns, project delays	Long-term financial strain	Budget deficits and project failures	Optimized resource management and cost savings	Budget Officer	RA No. 9184 (Government Procurement Reform Act)	Budget oversight, resource tracking	3	2	6	Medium	Resource Management Optimization, Financial Accountability Programs
Poor implementation of systemic reforms	Resistance to change	Policymakers, Implementers	Slow reform adoption	Prolonged inefficiencies	Delays and failures in reform initiatives	Successful systemic transformation and efficiency improvements	Reform Coordinator	RA No. 11465 (National Budget Act)	Change management strategies, training	2	3	6	Medium	Systemic Reform Implementation, Change Management Training

This table provides a comprehensive overview of various risks and opportunities related to progress and accountability in the Philippines, along with the measures to address them.

Disclaimer from the Author:

Using a variety of frameworks and best practices that I have come across during my academic and professional career, this article is a study and reflection of my PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE. The given examples and figures are conceptual in nature and should be regarded as guiding principles rather than actual situations or fully verified data.
Instead of using this content as a final source for operational frameworks or policy implementation, readers are encouraged to use it as a reference for investigating concepts and tactics. Although the insights are intended to stimulate critical thinking and comprehension, neither official government procedures nor empirical research serve as their foundation.
When applying these ideas to actual circumstances, users should use caution and look for additional information or expert advice.

References: 

The 2012 Data Privacy Act (Republic Act No. 10173)

(n.d.) National Privacy Commission. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act 10173). taken from https://privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/

NPC Circular 16-01: Protection of Individual Information in Government Organizations

The National Privacy Commission (2016). NPC Circular No. 16-01: Protection of Individual Information in Government Organizations. taken from https://privacy.gov.ph/npc-circular-16-01-security-of-personal-data-in-government-agencies/

NPC Circular 2023-06: National Privacy Commission Circular 16-01 Repeal (2023). NPC Circular 2023-06: NPC Circular 16-01 is repealed. The file https://privacy.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NPC-Circular-Repeal-16-01-Signed.pdf was retrieved.

The Effects of Malaysia's Customs Automation

Hardy, R. July 2023. A streamlined customs clearance process. LinkedIn. taken from https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robhardyfr8_cabie-customsclearanceconsortium-importers-activity-7212369486878830594-wRPc

References

Brillantes, A. B., Jr., & Fernandez, M. T. (2011). Restoring trust and building integrity in government: Issues and concerns in the Philippines and areas for reform. International Public Management Review, 12(2), 55–80.
NCPAG

Transparency International Malaysia. (2025, February 10). Press statement – Improving internal controls at the Customs Department. Retrieved from https://transparency.org.my/pages/news-andevents/press-releases/press-statement-improving-internal-controls-at-the-customs-department
Transparency International Malaysia


World Customs Organization. (2023). Integrity risk in the customs automation system. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355319465_Integrity_Risk_in_The_Customs_Automation_System
ResearchGate


Berghof Foundation. (2023). Equipping peace processes for accountability and integrity. Retrieved from https://berghof-foundation.org/files/publications/BF-From-entry-Points-to-Sustainable-Action-digital.pdf
Berghof Foundation

Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. (2025, February 10). PM Anwar: Customs Dept must strengthen integrity, tackle corruption head-on. Malay Mail. Retrieved from https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2025/02/10/pm-anwar-customs-dept-must-strengthen-integrity-tackle-corruption-head-on/166211